The faster a business enters the market, the better its chances of success. However, many start-ups and new entrepreneurs can undermine the importance of app testing before the eventual launch. The rush of developing your application and launching your brand shouldn’t come at the compromise of automated testing.
Testing processes, especially those that increase speed and remove bugs from a free-flowing app, should not be trivialised at all. A buggy application can kill your brand impression and lead to negative reviews from your customers. A slow app with UI bugs may lead to an explosion of unsatisfied customers and may stop your growth before your business even gets the chance to make its mark.
Not too long ago, start-ups relied on manual testers to do the job for them. With innovation in technology, and better testing technology, developers now have the luxury of opting for automatic testing.
In this article, we take a look at the benefits of automation testing for tech business start-ups. The article explores the significate cost and time savings of automation testing while emphasising on their importance.
The Use Case for Automation Testing
Automation testing is beneficial for tech business start-ups in multiple situations. The use case for automation testing includes:
- Automation testing can cover bugs and errors across multiple releases and updates.
- Automation testing can minimize the time and money wasted on repetitive testing.
- Automation testing is heavily focused on regression testing.
- Automation testing is used for large-scale cases.
- Manual testing and entry errors can lead to loss of data, money, and time.
- Some manual tests can take a lot more time to finish.
- Automation testing is based on keywords and data.
- Manual smoke testing, performance testing, and load testing can be time-consuming and costly.
Benefits of Automation Testing for Tech Start-ups
Having studied the use case of automation testing, we now look at some of the benefits this testing method carries for tech start-ups:
Reduced Costs with a Better Return on Investment
Most start-up owners would look at the initial cost of implementing manual and automation testing, and feel that the latter is more expensive than the former. However, once the test cases for automated testing are written, they require limited human intervention. After just a few weeks of first implementing automation testing, the cost of the software falls fourfold.
Automation testing is performed as soon as the development process is started so that all bugs and errors are identified early, and nipped in the bud. The early detection of bugs can help increase time to market and can also improve the flaw detection process.
Constant Test Execution
Automation testing speeds up the test execution pace and turnaround time with constant tests and execution. Tests can now be performed from almost anywhere around the globe. The 24/7 processing can help improve the time it takes for the total testing process.
For instance, regression testing takes start-ups 80 hours to complete. Previously, with manual testing, this process would take 10 days to complete. A manual testing employee working 8 hours a day would be able to complete the task in no less than 10 working days if they work with full dedication.
Automation testing, on the contrary, speeds up the testing process and delivers the same results for regression testing in a time of 3.3 days. Also, manual testers will not be able to cater to client requests across odd hours. Automating testing will ensure that client requests, even if they come at 3 at the night, are looked after.
Reuse Tests Multiple Time
Automation testing codes can take time to compile and implement. However, once the code is created, it can be reused for as many tests as wanted. Manual testers, alternatively, have to compile new tests every time a new update comes, which can be mentally exhausting.
Automation testing can provide some respite to QA teams and give them an opportunity to test different operating systems and solutions with the same code. Automation testing cuts down on the need for new scripts and solutions whenever the OS or device changes. This allows organisations to redo similar tests again, while saving overall time and effort. Automation testing can also simplify browser compatibility tests and lead to smoother run time.
Improved Success Rate
Manual testers absolutely hate regression testing. Why? Because they have to repeat the same tasks over and over again, to the point of exhaustion. The constant repetition can cause exhaustion to testers and also reduce the chances of success across the testing process. Software developers have multiple time constraints and may require faster operations, which can lead to operational inefficiencies in manual testing.
Automation testing, on the contrary, can save testers from doing repetitive tasks over and over again. Automation can help save QA teams from spending huge sums of money on fixing human errors. Test automation can also improve the overall coverage of the tests, leading to better efficiency.
Continuing from the point we’ve mentioned above, automation testing can significantly improve test coverage. Manual testing puts limits on the number of tests you can run and verify during a finite time period. Automation testing provides better coverage and can cut down on inefficiencies during the testing process.
The implementation of automation testing can give QA teams a chance to focus on writing new tests, and examining new areas across the app. This will result in better coverage and better bug fixing.
In conclusion, automation testing is much faster and more cost-effective than manual testing. You can reach out to us at QA Automation Solutions and get your dedicated automation testing expert without the added cost of building an in-house team. Our company is specialised in helping start-ups introduce testing (automated testing) into their workflow.